This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| 7 minute read

UK data protection and ePrivacy reforms take effect: what businesses need to know

The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (the DUAA) gained Royal Assent in June 2025. It includes a raft of reforms to the UK’s data protection and ePrivacy regimes that are relevant to almost all companies. While a small number of those reforms entered into force at earlier dates, the bulk of them became applicable on 5 February 2026. 

This blog post explains some of the most significant new data protection and ePrivacy law changes that will impact those doing business in the UK. It also highlights certain other data protection reforms yet to be implemented. 

The DUAA is a wide-ranging Act, with implications beyond data protection and ePrivacy law. Click here to read more about some of its other aspects.

Background 

Prior to 5 February 2026, the UK’s data protection and ePrivacy regimes remained largely based on the EU’s GDPR and ePrivacy laws, except for some minor amendments that were required as a result of Brexit. The DUAA has now introduced notable further divergence from the EU’s regulatory regime.

The most consequential reforms now in force include: 

At-a-glanceSummary of the reforms
Facilitating international transfers of personal data

The DUAA introduces a more liberal ‘risk-based’ approach to international transfers of personal data that may therefore facilitate increased transfers of personal data outside the UK. This includes:

  • a revised set of criteria that the government will use to decide if the laws of a non-UK country are generally ‘adequate’ and therefore personal data can be sent to that country from the UK without additional safeguards; and
  • a new statutory test that will govern how organisations should undertake transfer risk assessments that must be completed before using commonly used safeguards to transfer personal data outside the UK (eg certain approved data transfer agreements or binding corporate rules).

These reforms are explored further in our separate blog post.

The DUAA also includes reforms to help facilitate responses by communications service providers (and various related entities) to certain information requests from US authorities.

Facilitating automated decision-making and use of AIThe reforms empower organisations to implement automated decision-making in additional scenarios. These complex but significant changes are explained in this blog post.
Changes to the ePrivacy regime governing aspects of direct marketing plus the use of cookies and other tracking tech 

Key changes include:

  • unlawful direct marketing and the unlawful use of tracking technologies (eg cookies) are now subject to increased fines equivalent to those under the UK GDPR (ie up to the greater of £17,500,000 or 4% of an undertaking’s total annual worldwide turnover, compared with a previous maximum of £500,000);
  • officers (eg directors) of businesses may also now be subject to personal penalties of up to £17,500,000 for certain infringements of the ePrivacy regime (eg in connection with various unlawful direct marketing), compared with a previous maximum of £500,000;
  • reforms to rules relating to the use of cookies and other tracking technologies include:
    • expressly extending those rules to cover: (1) the collection and monitoring of information automatically emitted by the equipment (eg, Wi-Fi probe requests); and (2) those instigating the storing of, or access to, information;
    • exempting certain further cookies (and the like) from the general requirement to obtain consent if an appropriate right to object and certain information is provided, such as various cookies used for analytics or to record the preferences of subscribers/users; and  
    • giving the government powers to vary exemptions in the future; and
  • amendments to definitions relating to direct marketing, such as to clarify that ‘call’ includes attempted calls.
Protection of children’s data

The DUAA amends controllers’ data protection by design obligations for those processing personal data in the course of providing information society services (which include most online services) likely to be accessed by children. 

Under the reforms, in-scope controllers must take account of certain ‘higher protection matters’ when assessing what technical and organisational measures are appropriate. 

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published updated guidance on data protection by design to help businesses apply this new duty.

Data subject requests 

The DUAA implements changes to the calculation of timeframes within which responses to data subject requests must be provided and clarifies the scope of searches the controller is obliged to undertake. These changes will often benefit data controllers, including by specifying they may:

  • ‘stop the clock’ on the response time if they were unable to respond to a request without receiving further information or clarification from the person making the request (building on rights to ‘stop the clock’ the ICO had already granted in its guidance on data subject access requests); and
  • limit searches in response to a data subject access request to what is ‘reasonable and proportionate’ (under one of the few reforms that took effect immediately upon Royal Assent).
New duties and powers for the ICO

The DUAA makes various changes to the ICO’s duties. For example, the ICO is now:

  • required by law to have regard to promoting innovation and competition;
  • granted new enforcement powers (eg, the right to require an organisation to produce a report or compel a person to attend an interview in connection with an investigation); and
  • empowered to take longer than six months to issue a penalty notice following its notice of intent where necessary, and provided it does so as soon as reasonably practicable. This will give it more time to complete investigations, which could help strengthen and prolong enforcement actions. 

 

 

Other reforms that may be relevant to certain businesses and are now in force include:

At-a-glance                      Summary of the reforms
Facilitating the processing of personal data for new purposes                                                                                                                                                                                    

Reforms were made to:

  • assist controllers in determining whether the processing of personal data for a new purpose (eg, to improve an AI system) is compatible with the purpose limitation principle; and
  • pre-approve certain purposes as ‘compatible’.

Where relevant, businesses will need to ensure that compatibility assessments and templates are updated accordingly. 

Assisting organisations using personal data in connection with undertaking certain research

The DUAA has: 

  • clarified how controllers processing data for scientific research purposes may obtain consents where it is not possible to fully identify the purposes for which the personal data is to be processed at the time of collection;
  • clarified that certain commercial research activities can benefit from special rules regarding research (some changes are also made to liberalise processing for statistical purposes);
  • clarified and collated various provisions relating to safeguards to be employed for processing for research, statistical and certain other purposes; and
  • provided further exemptions from the need to give transparency information to data subjects.
Minor amends to information/transparency obligationsThese include creating a revised ‘disproportionate effort or impossibility’ exemption in relation to the requirement for information to be given to data subjects where the data was not collected directly from them. The reform is intended to clarify that the exemption applies to all processing and to provide a non-exhaustive definition.
Reformed notice period for personal data breaches impacting public electronic communications services

Providers of a public electronic communications service (ie entities which provide any service allowing members of the public to send electronic messages, including telecoms providers and internet service providers) are subject to a personal data breach notification regime under UK ePrivacy laws, which is distinct from that under the UK’s general data protection regime. Those obligations had previously included notifying the ICO of a personal data breach within 24 hours. 

The reforms (which took effect in 2025) have relaxed these obligations to require reporting of breaches without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after becoming aware of it (plus an obligation to explain any failure to notify within the 72 hours).

 

Express confirmation that certain processing ‘may’ be lawful under the existing legitimate interests basis

 

The reforms expressly confirm that certain processing may be permitted under this existing lawful basis if it passes a legitimate interests assessment, including processing necessary for: (1) direct marketing; (2) intra-group transmission of personal data for internal administrative purposes; and (3) ensuring the security of network and information systems. 

 

Reforms focused on the public and third sector

The DUAA also implements various other reforms that are generally most likely to be relevant to processing by public authorities, NGOs and charities (which are out of scope of this article). 

Those include a new ‘recognised legitimate interests’ lawful basis for certain processing related to: (1) national security, public security and defence; (2) serious civil emergencies; (3) detecting, investigating or preventing crime and apprehending or prosecuting offenders; and (4) safeguarding vulnerable individuals.

 

Future reforms 

While most of the data protection and ePrivacy related reforms are now in force, notable reforms yet to take effect include: 

  • New data controller duties relating to complaints: From 19 June 2026, the DUAA will give individuals a statutory right to make complaints to the controller and impose a statutory obligation on controllers to put in place processes to facilitate complaints and respond to them within certain timeframes. Privacy notices must be updated to reflect that right.
  • The replacement of the ICO with a new ‘Information Commission’: The ICO currently regulates the UK’s data protection and ePrivacy regime along with many other information laws. The timeline for the ICO to be replaced by the Information Commission remains unclear. The government had previously indicated it was targeting ‘early 2026’ to complete this change. 

More broadly, the DUAA introduces extensive powers for the Secretary of State to make subsequent reforms to UK data protection laws through secondary legislation and without the need to pass further primary laws through Parliament. For example, the Secretary of State is given powers to add new items to the list of special categories of personal data that benefit from additional protections under the UK GDPR. These powers make regulatory reform in various aspects of the data protection regime more likely going forward. 

Implications

The DUAA introduces greater flexibility and divergence in certain areas (eg, automated decision-making, data processing in connection with research and international transfers). However, many organisations will be subject to both UK and EU GDPR regulations. As a result, the government’s efforts to reduce burdens on organisations might not lead to cost savings if organisations find it more cost-effective or otherwise prefer to adhere to the stricter EU GDPR standards to meet the requirements of both regimes.

The DUAA also introduces some new burdens on organisations and a need for them to consider how they should adapt their existing UK processes. For example, businesses will face potentially far higher fines for infringements of the ePrivacy regime, new enforcement powers and the requirement to put in place a process to facilitate data subject complaints. 

Impact on transfers of personal data from the EU to the UK

The UK government has made clear that it understands the importance of keeping the UK’s designation from the European Commission as an ‘adequate’ jurisdiction, which allows most personal data to be transferred from the EU to the UK without the need to put in place additional safeguards. The European Commission did not regard the DUAA reforms as problematic, and the UK’s adequacy decision was renewed in late 2025. However, the further divergence from the EU’s regime may increase the odds of a successful challenge to the UK’s adequacy status before the EU’s Court of Justice, regardless of the European Commission’s view. 

Action required 

The reforms are evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Organisations that already complied with the UK data protection and ePrivacy regimes as they existed before 5 February 2026 are likely to only need to make limited changes to their governance or activities. 

Nevertheless, it remains important to check that policies, processes and documentation have been reviewed and adjusted for compliance and to make the most of the new opportunities these reforms create. 

Tags

data, data protection, uk 2025 data reforms, ai, uk