This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.

Freshfields TQ

Technology quotient - the ability of an individual, team or organization to harness the power of technology

| 3 minute read

The Digital Services Act – a liability regime for user content for the next twenty years?

What should we expect?

The legal framework for digital services in the EU has been largely unchanged since the adoption of the e-Commerce Directive in 2000. The e-Commerce Directive has been instrumental in regulating digital services in the EU – and shielding many online intermediaries from liability for hosted user content. However, the digital landscape today is very different to what it was twenty years ago. Digital services platforms like social networks, search engines, marketplaces and content-sharing platforms are central to the way consumers share information and communicate. New platforms come with new risks (including trading in illegal goods and services or the dissemination of disinformation), calling into question the safety of vulnerable users.

Despite the success of the long-standing principles established by the e-Commerce Directive, some stakeholders argue that the current framework is out of date. Some Member States have addressed these concerns at a national level, leading to fragmentation within the EU in respect of how obligations imposed on platforms are applied. With this in mind, the European Commission has recently spent time considering how to bring the law up-to-date (with an eye on establishing coherence with other instruments such as the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market), and announced a new ‘Digital Services Act’ as a measure for shaping Europe's digital future.

The Commission's goal 

The Commission's goal is to further develop the European single market for digital services and clarify responsibilities for those services, whilst promoting innovation, growth and competitiveness whilst protecting individuals’ fundamental rights. The Commission has considered three options, varying from light-touch fixes to the e-Commerce Directive to a more comprehensive update.

The options considered 

  1. The first option would be unlikely to change the text of the e-Commerce Directive. Instead, this option would likely involve making the Commission's 2018 Recommendation on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online binding. These Recommendations highlight the need for service providers to take effective measures to tackle illegal content online. This option would include effective notice-and-action mechanisms to report illegal content (and would impose transparency reporting obligations on the measures taken).
  2. The second option would likely involve an update of the e-Commerce Directive's rules (upgrading the liability and safety rules and removing the existing disincentives relating to platforms voluntarily addressing illegal content). This option would impose a series of additional transparency obligations on platforms, for example on systems that select the information that users see online, enabling users to understand and influence what information is being presented to them. The measures would apply to all relevant services targeting users in the EU.
  3. The third option would effectively build on the second option, creating a system of enforcement and cooperation between Member States. It would impose additional obligations on larger platforms, including additional transparency obligations regarding content monitoring, advertising and content targeting.

The Commission invited stakeholder feedback through a public consultation on these options. Compared to other significant Commission initiatives, such as its White Paper on Artificial Intelligence, which received 1,215 responses, the consultation on the Digital Services Act received more than 3,000 responses, highlighting the huge interest from industry, civil society organisations and national governments.

Despite the volume of feedback, the Commission’s thinking is well advanced, and we will likely see an update of the e-Commerce Directive’s rules, coupled with additional responsibilities for larger platforms and greater enforcement by, and cooperation between, Member States.

What might this mean for businesses?

If the Commission proceeds in the direction of the third option:

  • platforms will likely be subject to due diligence obligations, including in relation to monitoring for illegal content and enhanced ‘Know Your Business Customer’ requirements;
  • platforms will likely be subject to increased transparency obligations, in an effort to protect users' fundamental rights;
  • larger platforms will likely be subject to additional obligations, increasing their overall compliance costs the and complexity of their oversight; and
  • online intermediaries can expect clarifications regarding the scope of the intermediary liability regime, including in relation to proactive measures to remove content.

What’s next?

On 2 December 2020, the Commission plans to publish the ‘Digital Services Act’ as part of a wider package together with an initiative imposing ex ante rules on large online platforms acting as gatekeepers (as well as increased powers for the EU to pre-emptively investigate digital markets). We will share more detailed reaction to these initiatives and what they mean for businesses, once the text is made available.

Given the amount of interest shown in the Digital Services Act before we have even seen a legislative proposal from the Commission, as well as recent battles around related legislation such as the Digital Copyright Directive, the legislative process for the Digital Services Act is likely to be protracted.  

It remains to be seen whether the UK will implement similar rules at the end of the Brexit transitional period or whether the UK will choose to diverge from the EU in this area. Of course, digital services are global in nature and UK (and other international) businesses will likely be affected by the Digital Services Act in any event.

Tags

platforms, europe, eu digital strategy