This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.

Freshfields TQ

Technology quotient - the ability of an individual, team or organization to harness the power of technology

| 1 minute read

Hong Kong regulator signals approval of e-signatures for non-face-to-face account opening

In light of proposals from the financial industry that Fintech solutions should be adopted for client onboarding, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has recently issued guidance on the Know-Your-Client requirements for financial intermediaries in the context of non-face-to-face account opening. In particular, the SFC has recognised the validity of e-signatures for verifying client identity in certain situations. According to press reports, this has been welcomed by the industry, while some market participants expect the establishment of new business relationships with overseas clients – in particular Mainland Chinese clients – to be easier as a result of the latest guidance. 

Under the SFC Code of Conduct, verification of client identity through the use of recognised certification services is permitted. The SFC has now clarified that the use of certification services provided by overseas certification authorities for client identity verification could be accepted, provided that their e-signature certificates have obtained mutual recognition status accepted by the Hong Kong government (“recognised signing certificates”). Firms onboarding clients online may therefore allow clients to use the recognised signing certificates to create e-signatures in executing client agreements.  

To ensure the integrity of the customer due diligence process, the SFC has also clarified that where an intermediary appoints an affiliate to conduct client identity verification for the purposes of account opening, the SFC would expect such an affiliate to be a regulated financial institution. 

Regarding the industry’s suggestions regarding, for example, the use of biometrics in account opening, the SFC considered that any such use of technology in overseas markets would be largely for transaction authorisation rather than client onboading. The SFC however stated that it would keep in view technology developments and would continue its engagement with the industry in this regard.

Tags

intellectual property, cyber security